OraTaiao is opposed to the Principles of the Treaty of Waitangi Bill. The Bill threatens to undermine collective well-being, climate action, and health equity by eroding the constitutional and social fabric of Aotearoa New Zealand.

The Bill weakens the health sector, environmental protection, and protections for Māori. 

Unity, cohesion, and respect are essential for well-being. All of which this Bill fundamentally undermines. As health advocates, we stand for Te Tiriti and its promise of equity, justice, and peace for all in Aotearoa New Zealand.

OraTaiao's full submission to the Justice Committee is available here.

The New Zealand Transport Agency released a discussion document in November about increasing the “private share of public transport operating expenditure”. This means that councils would need to take in more revenue to offset the cost of running public transport by charging more money for buses, ferries, and trains. While not set into policy yet, this document shows a clear direction from the government and one that OraTaiao fundamentally opposes.

Our transport working group, led by Steve Grimson, has written a letter to Transport Minister Simeon Brown, calling for the government to reverse this defunding and invest in public transport as a health intervention. Please consider writing a letter to Simeon (feel free to use ours as a template) to show widespread health professional disapproval of such a damaging proposal. 

NZ is the highest per capita historic emitting nation, wealthy, full of natural resources, and among the highest per capita emitters globally. We must be a fair team player to limit global overheating to our humanly adaptable 1.5˚C. There is no excuse for delaying a much more ambitious NDC of over 80% by 2035 for global and international equity. Te Tiriti, fairness, human and planetary health must set NDC2.

OraTaiao's full submission to the Ministry for the Environment, prepared by Liz Springford, is available here.

OraTaiao strongly opposes the amendment bill and urges that it is not progressed. The bill prioritises short-term economic gains over the essential need to reduce our fossil fuel dependence. A fairer, faster and more cost-effective energy transition is possible without the use of new oil and gas. 

OraTaiao's full submission to the Economic Development, Science and Innovation Committee, prepared by Dermot Coffey, is available here.

Unfortunately, the small reductions that have started and the hope for accelerating these are mostly stalled or reversed by a barrage of climate-hostile policy changes. The draft second Emissions Reduction Plan is inadequate to achieve the domestic 2050 emissions targets. We are already way off track to meet our third emissions budget, our 2050 net zero target, or our Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC), and we can’t see how the 2026-2030 plan will turn the ship around. Our inaction will make things even worse. The government's net-based approach wastes the unprecedented opportunity for health gains and health sector savings by prioritising direct gross emissions cuts with health co-benefits. To a tired and stretched health sector workforce, this is indefensible. Furthermore, fully resourcing all Māori and iwi-led emissions reduction plans and priorities is long overdue. Aotearoa’s climate action must enable an equitable transition, grounded in Te Tiriti o Waitangi and Mātauranga Māori. 

OraTaiao's full submission to The Ministry for the Environment, prepared by Liz Springford, Scott Metcalfe, and Dermot Coffey, is available here.

Meaningful emissions reductions come from, well… reducing emissions. Not trying to catch them with closed fists. OraTaiao is concerned that carbon capture, utilisation, and storage schemes are a distraction from meaningful climate action. These schemes pose significant threats to our climate goals, and to health equity. The proposal will fail to abate emissions, will not ensure environmental integrity, and is not appropriate for the Aotearoa NZ context. Using CCUS as a greenlight for proceeding with oil and gas exploration is not only a significant financial and technical risk, it will increase climate damage and harm to human and ecosystem health. Each stage of the CCUS process poses major public health risks; also not present in MBIE risk assessments. We urge MBIE not to incentivise carbon capture schemes, and to reprioritise climate health and health equity.

OraTaiao's full submission to the The Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment, prepared by Summer Wright, is available here.

We take issue with the narrow lens the Climate Adaptation Framework is taking, namely the focus on weather-related concerns. Furthermore, health and well-being is often given little (if any) consideration when designing solutions for climate adaptation other than in the protection of health service facilities. This is a significant oversight due to each climate risk having health and well-being implications as part of the cascading risk profile. We highlight that the wider health sector has recently created climate change scenarios in line with XRB Climate Standards. The best way to minimise the long-term costs relating to adapting to the physical risks of climate change is to continue rapid and significant investment in climate change mitigation.

OraTaiao's full submission to the Finance and Expenditure Committee, prepared by Dr. Dermot Coffey and Vicktoria Blake, is available here.

We strongly support bringing emissions from international shipping and aviation into our existing climate response framework. Incorporating international aviation emissions into our existing systems would allow the tourist industry to pivot with support to a post-fossil fuel world. We resist efforts to protect the status quo, namely, the international shipping industry not paying its fair share for the climate damage it causes.

OraTaiao's full submission to He Pou a Rangi The Climate Change Commission, prepared by Dr Dermot Coffey, is available here.

We strongly support strengthening our 2050 targets, acknowledging the significant health gains associated with well-designed climate action and the necessary deepening of such action that global equity demands. We call for swifter and more ambitious cuts in our short-lived and long-lived gases. This is in recognition that the window for remaining under average warming of 1.5˚C is much smaller and closing. The risk of crossing irreversible climate tipping points should not be underestimated, and these need to be part of any decision on the rapidity of biogenic methane cuts.

OraTaiao's full submission to He Pou a Rangi The Climate Change Commission, prepared by Dr Dermot Coffey, is available here.